The Current State of Email Marketing in 9 Fascinating Stats [#SlideShare]

Some very interesting stats on the slideshow, just click the title and you can view them.  The interesting stat to me was 20% of marketers link their primary revenue back to email.  I think this number is too low.  Email is still the best channel for businesses.  

Now I believe mobile will overtake email soon because it is a more direct channel.  Mobile apps have the potential to be the greatest marketing channel in our lifetime.  The phone is always with us.  It knows where we are, where we've been.  It knows if we are moving or standing still.  It knows where in our store our customers have been.  It is also always on, always available.

Email is not dead, but it already knows who will kill it.   

Marketers, You’re Thinking About Loyalty Programs All Wrong, And Other Consumer Disconnects [Study]

By Ginny Marvin:

Companies expecting to sit back and rely on their loyalty programs need to take a hard look at how their programs connect with key customers.

I wrote about the true purpose of loyalty programs earlier and this survey really brings to light that piece.  Marketers want to sit back and let the loyalty program be the driver of loyalty business, when that is just a piece of the puzzle.  There's so much rich, valuable data that comes with the loyalty program, that is what should be the focus, using the program as the carrot to give as much data about the customer as possible.  

Nearly three-quarters of consumers (73 percent) said that loyalty programs should be for brands to show appreciation for their loyal customers. And yet, two-thirds (66 percent) of marketers see it the other way around: loyalty programs are for consumers to show their commitment to their businesses.  “Businesses must revise their strategy and prove to consumers that loyalty goes both ways,” the report’s authors point out.  

It is troubling to see so many marketers looking upon their loyalty programs like this.  We all know that customers will want the most they can get out of the program and nothing is ever enough, but marketers need to be more strategic.

Similar to the complaints about loyalty programs being used by companies to get the sale rather than develop customer relationships, consumers also have gripes about email marketing practices. Interestingly, businesses seem to know their is a problem but can’t seem to change bad habits.

While 58 percent of the marketing executives polled acknowledged that customers don’t want to be sold, companies continue to pummel consumers with untargeted, untimely offers. Many businesses know this is a problem. Over a quarter (28 percent) of companies said they believe the reason consumers most often unsubscribe is because they’re sending too many emails and irrelevant offers. Consumers agree: just 10 percent said the majority of promotional marketing they receive is relevant to their purchase interest.

Marketers need to combine the practices of the loyalty program and email marketing (all of digital marketing for that matter) under one umbrella.  All of these disciplines need to work hand in hand.  I talked about companies changing their organizational structure to accommodate the new digital marketing age.  

When 90 percent of the promotional marketing customers receive is irrelevant, there is a problem.  I know in the emails I receive this is the case.  With so much data about customers, it is a wonder this still is happening in 2015.  As has been my mantra since Adobe Summit, relevant content will be the key to better customer experiences.   

Even though companies are getting better about the frequency of emails, there is still a faction of email marketers that believe more is better.  The secret to frequency of emails is to engage the customer a little more than the frequency in which they buy from you.  This way there is not an over saturation of emails, but there is also the opportunity to drive more frequency.

How to Activate Your Inactive Email Subscribers

Not my favorite article, but some good points to live by as a database marketer.  My main pet peeve is sending too many emails.  This has slowly been getting better through the years, I don't find myself getting so many daily emails, which is a testament to analytics I would imagine.

There are a number of reasons, but there are several common ones. And there are a lot of reasons at different companies. But the main one that we've found is that customers receive too many emails. So, it's always important for an email marketer to understand [customers'] preferences—especially the mailing frequency that your customers prefer. It's always important not to overwhelm them with emails. When you send too many emails, you're causing them to tune out.... They'll look at them, and just ignore them.

Getting back a customer that has become inactive is very difficult, so have different strategies for customers that are trending toward inactivity.  In my history I call these customers decliners and it is easier to save them before they become inactive.

The True Purpose of a Loyalty Card Program

Loyalty card programs are now a way of life.  So many businesses in every vertical has a loyalty program based on dollars spent.  The programs range from miles in airlines, to how many stamps does a customer have on their stamp card before they get a free yogurt.  The belief is these programs will drive loyalty and incremental purchases because of the benefits offered for the spend.  But do they really drive incremental spend?  Or should the true purpose of the program not focus on the incremental spend, but something entirely different?

Airlines are the standard bearer for loyalty programs.  Frequent travelers swear by the loyalty programs and can tell you how many miles they have in their account.  With so many travelers being able to quote their miles, this must work correct?  In reality very few of the people traveling through the air really care about the loyalty programs.  Most will actually look for price or non-stops when making a decision on who to fly with.  So who are these travelers who care about the program?  They are the 2% that drive most of the revenue.  Well that's a good thing right?  The funny part about this model is most of these travelers are not actually paying for their flights.  They are frequent business travelers who are not paying out of their own pocket, their work or customers are paying for it.  The irony of these loyal customers is they would never spend that kind of money with the airline if it was their own.  They are loyal to the program because they would like the free travel when they want to go somewhere on personal time, with the family.  

So what happens with the remainder of the travelers?  Is the program enough to drive loyalty?  The answer is no.  But that is ok.  They shouldn't be designed to drive loyalty from these customers.  If they actually did, they would more than likely be too rich of a program.  So what happens to the 98%?  Should companies just not push their loyalty cards on the rest of this market?  

Loyalty program should only be rich enough for customers to want to be tracked.  Now this means many different things for each industry.  For airlines it might mean a free amenity if the customer is a member of the loyalty program.  For a yogurt shop it could be a free topping for a member.  For a casino it is the ability to receive a comp.  Grocery stores are masters, you don't get the sale price unless you are a member.  Of course I want to join for that $10 off of my grocery bill.  

Loyalty programs are an opt-in for tracking behavior.  For the majority of your customers, the loyalty rewards in your program will either be out of reach or not worth any incremental spend.  But, what you are getting is behavioral data.  How often is the customer engaging, how much is the customer spending, what are the customers patterns.  Do they only come for sales?  Do they come only when they have an incentive?  Do they come a certain day of the week?

This is the gold that comes from the loyalty program.  Mining that gold has unlimited opportunity.  Loyalty programs have 3 major flaws.

1. They are not targeted
2. They are not proactive
3. They are easily copied

Loyalty programs treat customers differently based on 1 metric, a total amount of something.  Whether that's miles flown, purchases made or points that equate to dollars spent, the one metric is dollars spent.  Well that is a good start for measuring a customer, but what if a Customer A spent $500 3 times and Customer B spent $10 150 times?  They will both be in the same loyalty tier because they spent a total of $1,500, but they are entirely different customers.  If the company can get Customer A to spend 1 more time, it is worth a lot more than if they can get Customer B to spend 1 more time.  So the loyalty program doesn't incentivize customers equally.

Loyalty programs rely on customers to want to interact.  They are reactive mechanisms, waiting for customers to spend enough to get whatever reward the customer may be wanting.  Of course good database marketers can send out reminders that someone is close to a reward or they might move up a tier, but the reward has to be enough of a carrot for that customer to change their behavior.  

All the great innovations a company can make in their program can be copied by anyone, because it is a documented program.  If the strategy is to own loyalty by having the best program, any competitor could easily come over the top and have a richer program.  This leads a race to the bottom mentality.  The company could always come back over the top, but the programs start becoming too rich, remember only be rich enough to track behavior.  If a competitor can negate your best selling points (loyalty program), then the program can never be a competitive advantage, nor do you want it to be.

This all leads to the true reason to have a loyalty program, tracking behavior.  With targeted direct marketing, companies can inventive the behavior they are looking for.  A company can give Customer A a much different communication and offer because they know that the customer will spend $500 the next time they can get the customer to engage.  The direct marketing can be proactive.  Direct marketing can take a customer from someone that rarely comes in, to someone that engages with the business on a regular basis.  Last, but certainly not least, companies can innovate without being copied. Because direct marketing is not a published benefit, there can be many different tactics for a range of different customers and the competition is blind to the strategies.  

There is so much more opportunity in direct marketing compared to the loyalty program.  By keeping expenses as small as possible in the loyalty program, it leaves much more money for direct marketing to drive the business.  When allowed to drive the business, direct marketing can target customers in many different ways, based on the customers individual behaviors, with incentives that will truly drive that particular customer.  A loyalty program will never be able to do that as effectively. 

Social Media Study: E-Mail 40 times more Effective than Facebook and Twitter

So, after all the excitement about Facebook and Twitter as communities and marketing panaceas, a recent study by McKinsey & Company reports something counter-intuitive: good, “old fashioned” e-mails prove to be 40 times more effective than Facebook and Twitter combined.

That is, if your goal is to acquire customers, and not just share the latest family news or travel experience.

I don't really understand why they say this is "counter-intuitive".  I have believed for a long time that social media was not a good channel for businesses.  It costs a lot of money to be in those channels because of the immediacy that customers expect, but more importantly these channels are not targeted whatsoever.  When posting on Twitter or Facebook, everyone gets to see what is being posted.  Whether those are the customers you are trying to target or not.  It is an even worse channel when it comes to current customers.

It’s a lot of work, but the the research sighted Williams-Sonoma which reported a 10% improvement in response rates by personalizing their e-mails, based on the customer’s on-site and catalog shopping preferences.

Another interesting comment.  Of course there is better response when the emails are targeted to customer behavior.  When customers get offers that are tailored to their behavior they spend more, it is just a simple fact.  When email is used as a simple newsletter channel, they will get lost.  Don't over communicate and keep the offers tailored.  Those are the keys to effective email marketing.

Google Tabs happened, now marketers must step up their game

Marketing is always most effective when it is delivered with something else of value. If you open your postal mailbox and its nothing but ads, you tend to throw the whole bunch away. But, if one offer comes along with other interesting pieces of mail or if it includes something valuable like a gift card or a coupon, you tend to give it more attention.

Very profound statement.  It is not worth delivering a piece of mail or email without an offer.  The offer doesn't have to be something that cheapens your brand, but it has to deliver value to the customer receiving it, or else you will become junk mail or unsubscribed.

The new Gmail tabs obviously create an interesting challenge.  Even though they are being viewed less, it may provide customers a better way to interact with brands.  When all email is together, emails can get skipped or just ignored as they scan through.  However with the tabs, a customer has to be going and looking for a promotion.  Isn;t that what digital marketing is all about?  Engage with the customer when they want to be engaged, instead of the bombarding of their email feeds?

We asked nearly 5,000 consumers their attitudes toward the switch to Gmail Tabs inbox view. About 40 percent of respondents say they now spend less time with promotional messages from their favorite brand, while only 7 percent of users say they spend more time with promotions. This large percentage of respondents revealing they don’t spend as much time with their favorite brands shows that marketers must up their game.

Marketers should always be stepping up their game.  I get so many emails from companies on a daily basis, maybe this will make them stop and think about the "spam" strategy that seems to be the norm in this channel.  When emails are targeted and offers are valuable and thought out, customers will engage with your brand no matter what tab they are on.  Continue to over communicate and your brand will never make it out of the promotions tab.

Marketers, Go Back to Basics

"There's so much that's sexy in social media and in mobile right now," he said. "Anyone who's bought a smartphone in the last 18 months is doing some things they hadn't imagined yet." When they read about a big company launching a cutting-edge initiative, they want in — but the economics usually only make sense for large companies that have experimental budgets. Instead, he says it often pays to focus on bread-and-butter marketing (like direct mail) or even on technical innovations of the past few years that are effective, but less novel (like mobile websites).

In the gaming industry, direct mail is still king.  In fact, it's not really close with a response rate of over 4X then email alone.  Yet, many marketers get caught up in the sexy new marketing trends.  Social gets more attention than direct marketing, even though direct marketing brings much more profit.  Likes are revered, yet direct mail is boring and so yesterday.  Sometimes whats worked in the past is what will work in the future.  

Best Time To Send Email

Interesting article on times to send emails.  The research included 21 million different emails and the findings are similar to what I have seen in my career.​

One of the most important conclusions is that sending newsletters during readers’ top engagement times of 8 a.m. – 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. – 4 p.m. can increase their average open rates and CTR by 6%.

However, optimizing email timing takes more than awareness of top engagement times. As our research points out, it’s a combination of many factors, including knowledge of time zone differences, your subscribers’ daily routines and the practices of other marketers. Find out more for yourself:

Remember to test on your own data.  I have seen different optimal open rate times between properties in the gaming industry, so test many different times and days and determine what the optimal time for your organization.

Emails have the best results within the 1st hour after delivery. This is when 23.63% of all emails are opened. But 24 hours after delivery, the average open rate is close to zero.

Almost 40% of all messages are sent between 6 a.m. and noon. This can result in inbox clutter, and significantly decrease results for these emails.

Messages sent in the early afternoon have a better chance of being noticed and consequently achieve better results: up to 10.61% open ratio and up to 2.38% CTR.

Subscribers’ top engagement times are 8 a.m. – 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.- 4 p.m. with up to 6.8% average open rates and CTR.

​I like the afternoon hours.  It has a high engagement rate and most emails are sent in the morning hours.  The more you can stand out, without being too late to be stale, the better success your email campaigns will have.  

Remember, once an email sits for 24 hours, there is hardly any chance you will get a conversion.  ​

Why Email Marketing is King →

A retailer I've worked with which has 900 stores and is very active with email campaigns recently did a great study. It took a group of 105,000 customers in its loyalty club database, divided them into three groups of 35,000, and marketed to the three groups differently, as shown in the chart below (click to see a larger version). Thanks to the loyalty program, it was able to see all subsequent purchases by these customers.

Direct mail has a higher response rate than email. But note that direct mail costs about 100 times as much. Meanwhile, the data collected by the retailer allowed it to calculate its off-email multiplier (a simple matter of dividing the percentage of online sales by the percentage of in-store sales generated by email-only marketing). It is 3.76. In other words, for every email shopping cart sale, this retailer gets 3.76 other, typically non-tracked sales due to the email.

There are a couple of things I have a problem with that logic.  

1. The logic takes every single transaction from either mail or email used with a loyalty card as 100% because of the way they were marketed.  My guess, there's plenty of transactions that happened regardless of the marketing
2. The direct mail and email made nearly $135,000 more than just the email alone.  This well covers the 100 X multiplier of the direct mail and made more profit.  So why is email and direct mail together not king?​

Now don't get me wrong, I like email, but it is a tough channel these days with many businesses flooding the inbox of the customers.  Savvy customers have a separate inbox for businesses because they don't trust they won't get spammed.  ​

Just don't discount direct mail in this day and age.  These days your message has a lot less competition in that channel.