How do you create a data-driven culture in your marketing team?

Becoming a data-driven organisation doesn’t just rely on the right technology, structure and processes. The human element is essential, and without the right skills, qualities and roles, any effort to be successful at data-driven marketing is destined to struggle.
And the kinds of skills that support a data-driven philosophy are rich and varied.

This is very true.  The "art" and "science" that requires actionable data lean more to the art side in most marketing departments.  The biggest change is to respect what data can bring to the equation.  Many marketers don't respect data, they respect their gut and soft metrics like awareness.  While data doesn't solve all problems, it helps inform direction.  It helps decide what is happening with the customers you are trying to target, plus the ones that you aren't targeting and whether you should.  

“The data-driven marketing team is knowledgeable enough to converse freely with technical and statistical resources while staying laser-focused on getting the right message to the right person at the right time. But the most important quality needed in a modern marketing team is curiosity. Without that, I may as well outsource all of my data related work to a third party. Curiosity stimulates creativity and conversation, and aids decision-making.” 

I like the statement of staying laser-focused on getting the right message to the right customer at the right time.  Too many times teams lose their focus and start drifting on to answers that are either easy or different from the most relevant topics.  Understanding what data is saying is more valuable than having the person who can put the report together.  Money is made by providing the insight to the data, that is what I look for in my team.  But don't forget to have the guy that can put all the data together.

Quintero adds: “Building a data-driven culture is not an overnight process. It takes time. To me, a data-driven culture means building a safe environment where experimentation is encouraged and mistakes are tolerated. It’s less about having all the right tools in place – although that’s a critical part of the process – and definitely more about cultivating excitement around discovery and objectivity. Being data-driven is exciting and people should be encouraged to enjoy the process as much as making things happen.”

Changing a culture is a journey.  Teaching the team about why decisions are made from looking at the data and what the thought process for coming to the conclusions is critical in building the data culture.  No matter how smart a person is, if they don't understand the thought processes of decisions they will never be able to take leaps with the data.  If they understand what to look for in data, they beginning asking the right questions and delivering recommendations along with their questions.

Source: http://www.mycustomer.com/feature/marketin...

Building credibility for your analytics team—and why it matters

If you work with data regularly, chances are you trust it. You know how it's collected and stored. You know the caveats and the roadblocks you face when analyzing it. But, when you bring your findings to those further removed, you're asking them to take a leap of faith and trust in data they may know very little about.

Multiple times in my career I had to come into organizations and take teams that were not trusted in the organization and help build them into the trusted source of data accuracy and insights.  This journey is never easy.  It takes patience and requires a lot of persistence to change an organizations perception of the department.  But these points are good advice on a roadmap to do this.

Start Small

When trying to get people to believe in your team, it can be tempting to chase the biggest problems first. These problems often take a long time to answer, and can take several tries to get right. It's often better to first establish trust by picking early projects that you know you can win, and win quickly.Try starting with basic arithmetic to answer crucial business and product questions. For startups, some example questions might be:

  • What are the most engaging features of your product?

  • What is the company's core demographic? What do they like about the product?

Often, people don’t judge the answers to these questions on technical rigor, they judge them on business impact. Starting small can open doors to the big questions that you may have wanted to start with; if you've earned credibility along the way, you'll have more time, flexibility—and maybe resources—to tackle them.

I always find it helpful to start answering questions that are not currently being answered.  As Derek Steer points out in the article, don't start by trying to solve the worlds problem.  If your team tries to tackle tough problems, there will be a much more critical eye on the work and the data produce.  Allow your team to get some wins under its belt.  Remember, this is a journey, not a sprint.  Trust comes with wins, not home runs.

Know your audience

Keep your audience in mind as you begin to craft the story from your data. Add in the appropriate amount of detail your audience needs to focus on decisions rather than methods. What context might they need? Spending a little time thinking about what your audience cares about most also helps you anticipate possible questions and prepare answers in advance. Few things can help establish credibility faster than fielding a question during a presentation and immediately flipping to a slide that answers it.

This point is critical to garner trust.  When presenting data, make sure there is a story that is being told along with the data.  Guide the audience to the answers that you have found, don't let them have to figure it our themselves.  Be sure to explain to the audience what they are seeing and why it matters.  Make it simple, quick and insightful.

Don’t be a House

House, a brilliant albeit fictional doctor, routinely diagnosed rare diseases but had abysmal bedside manner. The thing was, House didn’t have to win his patients over—they were so desperate to survive that they would listen to his every word.

It's subtle, but consider your findings a conversation starter. Understand that the non-analysts have valid points too: they have experiences you don't have and they likely know something you don't. These discussions aren't about winning an argument, but making the right decision for the business.

Never use data for evil.  This is fairly common in Finance departments, but it is important not to attack decisions, but rather try to initiate conversations to come to the best business decision.  Once there is a tone of implication in the analysis, your team will lose the trust of the department that you are creating the analysis for.  Those departments made decisions that didn't have data to drive their decisions, so treat them as a partner, not someone that needs help.

Be Transparent

Analytics can feel like a black box to many people—making that leap of faith appear even larger. By showing even just the basics of your process, you can help others believe in it. To increase transparency try:

  • Making your work simple and understandable. Monica Rogatti would urge you to try division before doing anything harder. As your audience becomes more comfortable, up the game to simple regression models—it's not usually difficult for folks to understand the direction and magnitude of coefficients.

  • Finding simple ways to convey advanced concepts. For example,confidence intervals and p-values can be confusing for many people, but charts with error bars make these concepts easy to understand.

  • Using stories. If you're presenting information about feature usage, or events with technical backend names, paint a picture of how a user would see these features, or put events in plain-English names.

Numbers are difficult to interpret at times, taking the complex and being able to tell a story with it is an art.  Most analysts are great at finding data and creating insights if they have domain knowledge, however they can be terrible at communicating their findings.  Always have available the methodology for coming up with the answers, even if you believe it is a waste of time.  The haters in the organization will demand this, but it also humanizes the process for the non-analytical audience members that you want on your side.  

The most important part of the journey is to persevere.  The beginning of the journey is the hardest part.  I remember in my last position, the department I took over was the laughing stock of the organization.  It took them weeks to come up with an answer and no one believed in what they were saying because they were just being report monkeys, instead of providing any insights.  By the time we got going, we were the defacto data source for the organizations.  We created analysis for parts of the organization we didn't have anything to do with, but when the organization needed something done right, it came through our team.  That was because we had many wins along a journey.  

Source: http://www.datasciencecentral.com/profiles...

Business Intelligence for the Other 80 Percent

Ted Cuzzillo writes for Information-Technology:

We give business people everything. They’ve got data, and often it’s clean. They’ve got tools, and many are easy to use. They’ve got visualizations, and many of them speed things up. They’ve got domain knowledge, at least most do. Tell me: Why hasn’t business intelligence penetrated more than about 20 percent of business users?

This is a great question.  So many organizations have executive leadership that says they want information, dashboards and realtime information, yet when provided to them, it goes unread.  How does this happen?  The answer is what most executives want is a story.  They want someone to interpret the analytics and let them know what they should be looking at.  The dashboards act as content for speaking points.  Executives want the most important numbers at their fingertips so they can spit them out at a moments notice.  

What executives want is the rest of the data to be fed to them in a story with a narrative.  Here is the data, here is what we believe it says and here is what we are going to do about it.  It coincides with my article Data + Insight = Action.  

What executives need is all of these parts (data, insight and action) in one analysis.  They need to see the data, using visualizations to make the data easier to read.  They need the insight of the business experts in the form of a commentary, succinct and to the point.  Then they need what action is the business going to take with this newfound knowledge.  With all of this information to arm the executive, they can understand and make a decision on what to do.  

To reach "The Other 80 Percent," let’s turn away from the “data scientist” and to the acting coach. “A lot has to do with intangible skills,” said Farmer. A lot also has to do with traditional story structure, which appeals to “a deep grammar that’s very persuasive and memorable.”
Storytelling isn’t a feature, it’s a practice. One practicing storyteller, with the title “transmedia storyteller,” is Bree Baich, on the team of Summit regular Jill DychéSAS vice president, best practices.  While others talk about stories, she said, most people seem to start and end with data and leave out the storytelling art. They fail to connect data with any underlying passion. “What we need are translators, people who understand data but can tell the human story from which it arose.”

There is always an assumption that is made from an analyst that a visualization or a table of data is plain and understandable.  A good rule of thumb is to assume the audience of an analysis doesn't see what the analyst is seeing.  If analysts start with this assumption, they can then tell a story of why this data is fascinating.  An analysis without text that explains why the data is interesting is going to fall on deaf ears.  Once the analysis gets to a higher level, the executives will not have time to create the "insight" portion of the data and they will either send the analysis back, or ignore it completely.  Always remember to include the data, with the insight as a story and what action is going to be taken.  With this formula analysts will become more than report generators.  

Source: http://www.information-management.com/news...

What Great Data Visualization Looks Like: 12 Complex Concepts Made Easy

Very cool visualizations.  My favorite one is the unemployment rate by county that iterates through time to show the growth.  Very powerful.

In Geography of a Recession, Latoya Egwuekwe uses a short animated visualization to show the spread of the 2008 recession across the United States. By overlaying time, data, and geography, she is able to display both the rapid progression of unemployment and the regions hit hardest. Symbolically, the country visually turns darker as unemployment spreads. This effect of time-lapse on visualization is key to provoking insight from the viewers.


Source: http://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/great-vi...

Sometimes There Really is an Easy Button

The road to Tableau was an eye opening experience for me.  Noah really nailed it, there is nothing I couldn't really do before Tableau, but it just is so fast to do an amazing visual analysis that allows me to see opportunities, that I am so much more effective.

There’s absolutely nothing that Tableau can do that I couldn’t do before, but that’s exactly the point: it lets me do the exact same stuff much faster, cutting down on the parts of my job that aren’t the most exciting and leaving more time for more valuable work. So far, the things I use Tableau for take less than half as long as doing them with my more familiar toolset, and I end up with the same results.
Source: https://signalvnoise.com/posts/3844-someti...

Interactive Data Visualizations - It's Still About the Data

With so many data visualization tools out in the marketplace, it is a wonder why most organizations are still struggling to get these easy to build dashboards adopted throughout the organization.

It usually comes down to the data.  The data still has to be accurate and up to date and reliable.  So many organizations still struggle with this.  I believe it comes down to structure within the organization.  How does IT still control the data in many organizations?  IT tends to create processes and documentation that takes data forever to get into the hands of the users.  

It all depends on the size of the organization.  When organizations are very large, this type of process and documentation is needed.  Most organizations are not this size.  The data is used by a handful of people within the organization and a more agile approach to data needs to be taken to always have the best data at the soonest possible time.  Long lead times and processes that make moving things forward difficult lead groups within the organization to get their own data in many different ways and this leads to many different versions of the truth and lack of trust in the interactive dashboards.

Organizations need to move the data ownership into the hands of the data users to ensure one version of the truth.

Critical importance of data visualization

Clear presentation of data using graphics are critical to how fast people can understand the information and how comfortable they are in interpreting the information.

Great article using the Edward Tufte visualization of the data from the '86 Space Shuttle crash.  The engineers were very concerned about the temperature on the day of the launch, which they felt heightened the risk of the O-rings being damaged.

The engineers presented all the data to the decision makers through multiple reports and with the data spread out on many different pages.  Of course it was hard to put all the data together and understand the severity of the issue.

The actual fax of one page of the data to decision makers

The actual fax of one page of the data to decision makers

As you cab see, not really something that shows the severity of the issue. 

Edward Tufte's visualization of the severity for the launch

Edward Tufte's visualization of the severity for the launch

The graph shows 2 things.  

  1. The dots are previous launches and the severity of damage to the O-rings.  As the chart clearly shows the colder the temperature, the higher the risk for damage
  2. The Red X marks the temperature on the day of the launch in question.  Because the temperature is used on the axis and includes the launch day, it shows how far out of the normal ranges this launch was and since the damage increases as the temperature decreases, this shows the severity in a way that would have more then likely stopped the launch on that fateful day.

Now most of us won't be presenting data that will save lives like the example above, however it really shows how a good piece of visualization shows outliers and gives the decision makers easy to understand data to make better decisions without having to go through pages of data.

Source: http://www.kylehailey.com/critical-importa...

Tree Maps and Tableau

I'm beginning to become a big fan of the tree map.  It is very useful to see where business is coming from.  One of the cool features in Tableau is the user can bring dates to a row and then the tree maps also act as a bar chart comparing where the business is coming from YOY.  

Sample Tree Map from Tableau

As you can see above I can tell 2007 was my best total sales year with declining sales throughout the years.  The decline was primarily driven by Office Machines as the size of that box never returned to its largest total in 2007.  

I can see myself using this for many different dashboards and analysis in the future.  Maybe I may even use bubbles. 

Is Data Visualization Actionable?

Although data visualization has produced some of the most captivating artistic displays in recent memory, some of which have found their way into exhibits at the New York Museum of Modern Art and countless art installations around the world, business leaders are asking: is data visualization actionable?

I believe for the most part, the answer is yes.  Data visualization tells a compelling story which allows the consumer of the data to see patterns that are missed in analyzing the numbers.  Even when visualization cannot tell the whole story, they are able to point you in a direction that will save countless hours as they give a great starting point.  

The other side effect of visualization is it engages executives.  Executives love pretty pictures and stories without having to dig through multiple pages or large spreadsheets of numbers.  Dashboards are all the rage, but the visualization tells a story that executives can appreciate. 

Source: http://www.instapaper.com/read/408710334