Great Brand Apps Create Loyal Happy Customers

Mobile apps are the way we will interact with all of our loyalty programs in the digital age.  Smartphone apps can do so much more than a piece of plastic or punchcard could have ever imagined, yet so many companies have built half-baked, poorly thought out attempts at creating a customer experience.  But the good news is there are some leaders that are nailing it.

The 4 qualities a mobile app should possess are:

A mechanism to capture transactions 

At the heart of the mobile experience should be the mechanism to capture data about the customer.  This data should feed into the loyalty program of the brand.  This should come in the form of transactional, interests, surveys and geo location data.  Data is the building block for a loyalty program to succeed.  

Frictionless transactions

A mobile app has the ability to eliminate the frictions of the transaction.  For example, at an Apple Store the customer can enter the store, open the app, scan the item they would like to purchase and then leave the store, all without having to interact with a human or wait in line.  That is eliminating friction.

A mechanism to communicate with your customers

Mobile is a channel.  It is perhaps the most important channel in the new digital marketing era.  The phone is always on your customers body and that will soon include wearables.  The ability to push messages to your customers through this channel is extremely important.  The ability for your customer to open the app and see their loyalty program details makes communicating with your customer more personal than ever before.  This includes beacon support to guide the customer through the offline experience as well.  This should be the channel that receives the most focus in the coming years.

An engaging experience without a transaction

Mobile apps hold a space on the customers phone.  If you make your app engaging, even when the customer is not making a transaction with you, you may keep a good position on the phone.  Think of it as search rankings, the more prominent position, the more engagement with your brand.  Get stuck in a folder on the third page, you will only be utilized as a mechanism for transactions which is not the worst thing in the world, but doesn't drive behavior. 

Starbucks has been on the forefront in the mobile app space since it introduced its mobile app in 2011.  Starbucks took the approach of creating an app that engages customers when not in a Starbucks, along with making the transaction process frictionless.  Starbucks has long partnered with Apple by giving away free music and apps, but they also moved this functionality to the app.  By doing this, Starbucks has been able to engage their customers with their application outside of the brick and mortar stores.  I consistently look at my badges from Starbucks to see what free apps or music they are giving away this week.  Most of the time I don't get the freebies because they are not to my liking, but every once in awhile I do.  But it also has trained me to constantly go to the app.  I check my points and how far away I am for a free award and I am not even a big free award kind of a guy.

Starbucks has also made a frictionless payment process that also tracks my behavior.  I always received gift cards from Starbucks and had them strewn all over the place.  Some made it to the wallet, some were in drawers, but they were never consolidated.  Starbucks also had a loyalty program that was tied into a gift card, but it was confusing on how to interact with the program when I wasn't using that particular gift card.  Plus having to manually add money to the specific gift card was far from frictionless.  So I never really used the loyalty program and I was going to Starbucks less.  The app has removed all of this friction.  It is easy to transfer gift card money to the main loyalty account, which was a main pain point for me.  It also allowed for easy addition of funds into the card through the app.  These two items made using the program much easier.  

The other app that I have been very impressed with is the Chipotle app.  This app is a little different from the Starbucks app because it is just solving one problem, waiting in line.  The app allows you to place a Chipotle order and skip the line to pick it up at a designated time.  Now I don't know if any of you have been in a Chipotle and have to wait in the line to order, but it could be a fifteen minute exercise in browsing Twitter.  The app saves your favorites and recents so it takes approximately 20 seconds to place an order.  Pay online, just walk to the cashier and they hand you your bag of goodness and you are off.  Simple, frictionless and awesome.   

Improvements can be made in both of these apps to include more of the 4 qualities.  The Starbucks app nails 3 out of the 4, but can do a better job at using the app as a personal, targeted channel.  Right now the offers they have are not very tailored to my experience.  This is a big opportunity to make the app even more engaging.  For Chipotle, they only possess 1 out of the 4.  They might be monitoring my transactions, but they don't have a loyalty program tied to the app, so I am not sure.  The app is a great start, but they could hit a home run with the addition of some functionality.  Either way, I will still use it weekly to avoid the lines.

Are You Ready for an Omnichannel World?

One of my favorite title for an article.  I think it's a funny title to be honest, because it doesn't matter if you are ready, this is the current state of the customer experience.  Customers for a few years have been living in this world and we as digital marketers are finding it hard to catch up.  What's even more scary is the rate at which technology is moving.  If digital marketers don't become more agile, they will always be playing catch up.  The issue may be is that the distance they will have to catch up will widen.

Today’s customers engage with companies in multichannel and multitouchpoint journeys, which they pause and resume over time. For example, according to the Corporate Executive Board (CEB):

• 58% of callers have visited the web before calling, and

• 34% of callers are on the web while talking to a rep

For a customer to complete a single task – buy a product, answer a question, understand a bill – they often require multiple, disconnected interactions with an organization. When a customer needs assisted service to supplement self-service, they typically must start over when they engage with the organization.  In the case of voice, it’s calling a contact center, using an IVR, and explaining their issue. In the case of chat, it’s starting a dialog with an agent without any context to their journey. These time-consuming and disconnected ‘channel shift’ experiences are one of the leading causes of missed sales opportunities and high operating expense for organizations – as well as a major source of frustration for costumers.

I remember back in 2001 having this journey with AT&T landlines.  At that time AT&T was broken into local and long distance.  Well the bills came and they looked exactly the same and this was when online banking was just getting started.  Well I was paying all the bills to long distance, because I believed they were one in the same.  The bill looked exactly the same.  I was quite surprised when they turned off my phone because I hadn't been paying.  I mean, here I was I felt like I was always paying.  When I set up my phone service I didn't call 2 numbers.  

This is something that needs to be front and center.  This is nothing more than creating great customer experiences, just using customer service as an example.  The customer doesn't want to think about telling their story over and over, they want the context of their issue to move with them as they reach each touch point.  This is expected in the digital age.  The only thing really holding organizations back is their structure.  Organizations have to structure themselves to handle the guest through this omni-channel journey.  No amount of software will help if they don't start there.   

Southwest Airlines Making an Impact in Marketing Automation

I love Southwest Airlines.  They have been the ,most profitable airlines by creating a business model which serves both their customers and their shareholders.  Southwest has managed to delight their customers and they are one of the few airlines that actually turn a profit, plus they haven't gone to the nickel and dime your customer model that has been popular in the industry.

The one area they have been weak in is database marketing/marketing automation.  The emails my wife and I get from them are very generic.  These emails have never been tailored.  This is the same in direct.  I have a Southwest Visa card and I still get an application direct mail to this day.  They also send some of these applications multiple times per week.  I tend to forgive because I am not a fan of the nickel and dime approach most other airlines employ.

Out of the blue I got an email that was actually targeted, well I hope it was targeted and not everyone received.  They sent me a tier upgrade promotion if I flew 3 roundtrips in a 2 month period.  To give a little background, I was flying much more a year and a half ago and I was an A-list, but recently I haven't needed to fly as much and I lost that status.  What I hope they are doing is looking to see that I have the propensity to become an A-List and they are betting that I will take them up on this offer. 

I happen to be taking a couple of flights in that time period, but I was going to be one roundtrip short.  Now this is where the psychology of tier benefits are interesting.  In my experience, a company doesn't necessarily get a customer to do something drastically different in their behavior to get to the next tier level.  This is true in my case.  If I hadn't been taking those 2 other trips, I would not have flown 3 roundtrips to make it to A the rest of the year.  But since I was taking those trips and I was going to be close, I decided to take 1 more trip up north and see my stepdaughters.  I would not of otherwise taken this trip.  So the promotion made them some incremental revenue and has kept my loyalty with Southwest.

This could be a less targeted approach and I just happen to think it is because of my propensity.  They send me an email last week reminding me of the promotion ending, however they did not reference I was 1 roundtrip away, so they aren't exactly where they need to be yet.  But, if Southwest can put together a strong direct program with their superior business model, then other airlines will have even more to worry about.  Here is to hoping they are moving in that direction.

Using Smartphones and Apps to Enhance Loyalty Programs - NYTimes.com

I am such a big fan of using rewards on a smartphone.  There is no better way to communicate with a customer than with the device they are carrying around in their pocket.  The next evolution for rewards programs is moving from a card in the hand or a punch card mentality to devices that allow even smaller businesses to compete against bigger competitors.  

Smartphones and loyalty apps have begun offering small businesses enhanced program features and automated administration capabilities once affordable only to large companies like airlines and hotel chains. These capabilities also offer the equivalent of a real-world psychology lab for easily evaluating the effects of offerings and incentives on customer loyalty.

The key to any reward program is to capture data about a customers behavior.  If your program isn't allowing you to capture transactional level data in conjunction with the program, there may be a need to consider this approach.  If only to capture the amount spend and the date, this will allow a lot more opportunity for the business.  As I wrote in The True Purpose of a Loyalty Rewards Program, it is imperative to have a program that incentivizes a customer to share their data with you, but not over-incentivize.  The key is to drive behavior by targeting the customer, rather than giving everyone the same rewards.

“Clearly, this is the best of times for loyalty programs,” said Mr. Bolden of the Boston Consulting Group, who recommended that small businesses “focus on the non-earn-and-burn aspects of the program.” He suggested that spas consider a separate waiting room for their app-identified best customers.

“Or when the treatment is over, you hand the customer a glass of Champagne and strawberries,” he added. “If you’re an apparel retailer and you get in a new line from a new designer, invite the top 5 percent of your customers in first so they can see it before anyone else.” The point is that many effective rewards need not cost much to bestow.

Driving behavior is not all about a discount.  Understanding what your customers want and delivering them an experience is more important than a discount.  Because a customer that is coming just for a discount is more than likely not your most loyal customer.

“With apps you now can target specific customers and influence specific behaviors and keep track of all the results and understand the results,” Mr. Smylie said. “Because the check-level detail is now tied to a customer’s profile, we can understand what their purchasing behavior is, what their interests are and cross-reference that against their social media profiles and market to them more effectively and involve them at a deeper level with our brand.”

 

Next Generation Customer Experience - business2community

Terry Green writes for business2community:

...we all talk about customer journey mapping but how many of us have actually done it? No I don’t mean sitting listening to a boring presentation about the subject whilst fiddling with my mobile phone or making a half arsed attempt at it with no commitment – I mean really done it like we meant it?

I’ve always said that the key to getting any customer oriented change programme though an organisation is to get the business leaders to walk a mile in the customer’s shoes. Cliched? Yes but no longer enough. The challenge now is to get everyone inside your organisation to see themselves from the customer’s perspective and to understand how it makes them feel to interact with you.

What better way than customer journey mapping?

It is so important for organizations to do this mapping, but I agree with Green, it never seems to resonate with a larger team.  I feel because people going through this exercise tend to treat this as a transactional exercise instead of an emotional one.  What I mean by emotional is customers have an emotional attachment to their journey, they don't feel like what they are doing is a transaction.  

I believe one person should own the customer journey and bring people into the process for specific parts of the journey.  Journey mapping is a very overwhelming experience, but when broken up into pieces it could generate great conversations from the entire organizations.  When taken into pieces, the organization can concentrate on the emotion of a specific piece of the journey without having to get overwhelmed by the entire journey itself.  

It’s only when you have got your people to stop thinking like vendors and truly moved them into the customer’s headspace that you can start their journey towards customer centricity.

Keeping Up With Today’s Loyalty Demands

Originally posted on IBM’s Smarter Commerce blog:

Loyalty marketing is more and more prominent in today’s retail landscape. It is becoming common knowledge that customer acquisition costs are increasingly rising, and data-driven customer retention is a key area filled with untapped growth potential. But loyalty marketing is evolving and is more intricate than just offering discounts to existing customers. As many marketers realize, there are three common problems that they run into when trying to implement an effective loyalty program:

1. They often feel stuck offering dollars-off discounts and are losing their margins without sustainably changing their customer behavior.

2. Personalization is not going further than using much more than a first and last name, and is not connecting to the customer and building customer relationships.

3. Their loyalty members are not actively participating and being engaged, and consequently not influencing long term results.

It is a buyers market as they would say in the real-estate business.  Customers have the ability to buy from a multitude of companies with fairly frictionless transactions.  Years ago, a customer would be limited to their location to buy many of the items they can now purchase online, which makes loyalty marketing a much harder task today.  If the customer does not like an experience they have with your company, the friction to switch providers is much easier than in the past.

This has led to a race to the bottom with most companies.  Instead of competing on differentiation, companies rely on sales and discounting to compete in this new world.  Relying on discounts is not differentiated at all.  Any competitor can match a price or beat the price if they are willing to decrease their margins for the business.  As I wrote in Busy is Not a Strategy, many of your competitors will look at metrics like volume as their key metric which will force them to decrease margins and hurt your business.  

Increasing Self-Identification

Loyalty incentivizes customers to provide more information about themselves and engage across channels, which leads to a richer understanding of your customers and how they interact with your brand. You may be surprised how many of them are open to providing information about themselves in order to receive more relevant communications and offers.

Spending most of my time in the casino industry has shown me that consumers willingly give away information in return for a richer experience.  In the case of the casinos this comes in the form of comps, but in other industries this does not have to be a giveaway.  This could be access to sales, in the case of grocery stores.  Find out what your version of the comp is to increase customer self-identification.  It may start off as a giveaway, but don't let it drive the future customer experiences with that customer.  

Taking Personalization to the Next Level

In addition to increasing customer self-identification, you should track and analyze metrics such as order frequency, average order value, and from which channels customers are purchasing. Modern loyalty programs gather this customer data and provide a centralized hub which is used to personalize meaningful incentives and rewards for higher customer redemption and satisfaction, and also to send personalized messages. These messages can be targeted towards specific actions and customer segments, and are used to maintain relevance and build upon customer-brand relationships by making customers feel like you are paying attention to what they want.

If you aren't tracking the purchases of your customers then you aren't going to be successful in loyalty marketing.  Creating meaningful customer experiences relies on gaining insight to the behavior of the customer.  By getting the customer to opt-in, it allows the business to create the true value from the loyalty program as I wrote here.  Targeted content will create meaningful customer experiences and this rich data is at the core.  

Cohesive Omni-Channel Capabilities

With today’s consumer having the ability to interact with your brand across all channels, it is essential to have cohesive communication, connectivity of data, and customer access to your program and rewards at all touch points. Different consumers like to interact with brands through different channels – whether in-store, social media, or email – and your program should be available in their preferred channel.

Providing the same experience for the customer, no matter what channel they are using, is the key to creating meaningful customer experiences.  This is the hard part of the new customer experience paradigm.  Keeping the content and messaging across channels in an online and offline world can be complex, but is very rewarding.  Customers don't care that different divisions in the company have different responsibilities and the online team doesn't communicate effectively with the operations team.  Customers expect their experience to be seamless across channels and it is imperative that businesses adjust to create this seamless customer experience. 

How to Make Big Data Work for You

This article is the problem with Big Data.  Everyone wants to jump so many steps on their way to true 1-to-1 marketing using data as the cornerstone.  Great marketing is always an evolution.  One step forward using data brings results and different behavior is gleaned from that data.  Then that data is taken and different questions are asked of the data based on the results using the previous data set.  This is how marketing problems are solved using data.

Marketers can't take a dataset that is fairly large, one they are already struggling to make the most of anyway, and then be given a much larger dataset and told to "go make magic".  Marketing with data is a disciplined venture.  As a marketer, make sure you are making the most out of the data you already have before worrying about what keystrokes the customer is making or the "Internet of Things".  

Always make sure the next step in the data is one that will bring you value today.  Have a long term understanding of where the data can take you, but be disciplined in getting there or you just might miss a lot of insight on the way. 

Adobe Marketing Cloud Summit 2015

Upon returning from Adobe Marketing Cloud Summit 2015 I've had some time to digest the experience fully.  The Summit is a great weak of digital marketing discussions.  Of course since this is an Adobe event, the discussions are around the products Adobe is selling with the marketing cloud.  Fortunately for me, and Adobe, the overarching strategy Adobe is putting together with their products is extremely compelling.  

Just five short years ago Adobe had $0 of revenue from digital marketing products.  I believe in 2014 the amount of revenue was over $1.2 billion, but I didn't write the number down, it's not important.  What is important is Adobe, through mostly acquisitions, has created the most compelling digital marketing hub/cloud in the industry.  Adobe rates highest on the Gartner Magic Quadrant and it is in its infancy.

Having come from a software product background also, it is impressive they have been able to start to integrate most of these products together.  What Adobe is setting out to accomplish is no small feat.  Creating a singular platform from many disparate products is what marketers have to do on a daily basis with their own systems, but Adobe is attempting to make that life a whole lot easier.

Last year we were introduced to the marketing cloud strategy, a set of 6 products with 6 core services that support all the products.  I was very bullish on what was being layed out by Adobe.  The idea of taking a customer through their lifecycle with the company from anonymous to known, from new to dormant, all in one platform is very appealing to me as a marketer.  Adobe is trying in essence, to let marketers control their own destiny.

Today marketers have to fight to get things done.  Marketers destiny is in the hands of many other groups, from website developers, IT, database engineers and creative agencies.  Sometimes it amazes me that we as marketers are able to get an email out the door, or target an individual on a website.  The amount of effort sometimes makes a campaign not worth doing at all.  

There are three main thoughts I came away from the Summit with this year.

1. Audiences are the key to digital marketing
2. Adobe has a messaging issue
3. AEM should be the center of the marketing cloud universe

Audiences

I have always firmly believed the customer is the center of all businesses, yet I never believed they were the center of the marketing universe.  My belief is that everything starts with the customer and they are all different in their various ways.  Advertising tended to lump all the customers into one bucket and make the product the center of the universe.  Digital has come along and helped marketing become more targeted, but the hardest part of targeting is creating the single customer database.

Marketers have had to deal with a plethora of disparate databases of customers, which has made targeting especially difficult.  The need for database engineers to create a data warehouse bringing all the different customer databases together with each individuals spend slows the process of driving behavior through targeted experiences down to a crawl.  

Adobe audiences are referred to as a Core Service.  What that basically means is that all of the applications of the marketing cloud can use this customer database.  This makes audiences the key to allowing the marketing cloud to be the most targeted customer solution I have seen to date.  

Adobe tracks a customer from their first anonymous visit, to authentication, through the entire customer lifecycle.  The applications then allow marketers to target those customers in so many different ways.  From purchasing of ads, to email marketing, to push notifications for mobile apps, through retargeting campaigns, audiences can be used in all of these ways.  Same database.  No need for database engineers.  Hallelujah.

For example, a customer may come into the website, authenticate and reach a certain part of the purchasing funnel.  Through Analytics, this group of customers can be identified and a custom audience can be created.  Through AEM, email creative and a landing page can be created, by marketers, with approved assets from the brand team, to be used to create an email campaign for these guests.  With Target, different messages can be tested to determine what is the most effective message and offer for a customer to create the conversion.  Through Campaign, this audience can be used to send an email, measure the results, and a new audience can be created with all of the customers that didn't convert to create retargeting campaigns.  That's pretty powerful stuff right there.

Adobe Messaging

One of the concerning parts of the conference was the introduction of 2 new products for the marketing cloud.  The idea of having 6 products is already a little overwhelming.  The constant comments I was hearing from other attendees was confusion on what products they need and why.  This is a problem for Adobe.  I believe they have 1 product, the Marketing Cloud, with many features inside the product.  By keeping the multiple product structures, it is showing some infighting within Adobe.  As I said earlier, these products were purchased by Adobe to then be integrated into the cloud.  It seems those product owners are fighting for their power, which is making it confusing to develop the strategy with Adobe as a partner.

I also believe this product strategy makes the cloud more cost prohibitive.  Because so many products have to be purchased, it becomes more expensive than turning on features.  There also tends to be salespeople dedicated to the certain products, so there is a loss of 1 dedicated resource.  

I'd like to see Adobe move away from products an into features.  This will simplify the messaging and allow customers to purchase based on what they need, instead of what Adobe is trying to package.  It will allow more customers to be locked into the ecosystem of Adobe, instead of keeping their current products that aren't as integrated.  They should take some lessons from Apple.  The ecosystem is the most important play for Adobe right now and they should have a longterm vision for this strategy.  Once customers start crossing over into different products within the marketing could it will make it impossible to leave, because the customer database and all the processes are driven by Adobe.  

AEM is the Center of the Cloud

The digital marketing platform all started with the purchase of Omniture which turned into Adobe Analytics.  Analytics is the heart and soul of the Marketing Cloud and I believe has the largest  user base by far.  Analytics may be the soul, but I don't believe it should be the heart of the solution.  

Adobe Experience Manager is the heart of this solution.  It is the product that puts the marketers destiny into their own hands.  The ability to manage assets, create approved templates, change website messaging, create emails and create landing pages with variable content is so powerful.  It even can build mobile applications across platforms and manage all those apps in realtime.  

This is the heart.  Analytics allows the identification of opportunities to enhance conversion and make more money, but without AEM a marketer is stuck waiting for many other departments to help them take advantage of the opportunity.  Campaign allows for great multi-channel marketing, but without email creative and dedicated landing pages, the marketer is in a waiting game.  Target allows offers to be measured in real-time and a winner is chosen, but to get to that point, AEM has to manage all of the content and messaging.

Content is the key to delivering targeted experiences to customers in the digital age.  Let me say that again, content is the key to delivering targeted experiences to customers in the digital age.  The faster a marketer can deliver that content, through whichever channel, be it mobile app, website, email, social or ad, the bigger a competitive advantage that company will have over its competition.  This is why AEM is the heart of the marketing cloud/hub.  AEM will ultimately create the competitive advantage, because without it, the content will not be delivered at the speed in which customers will not only demand, but will also change their behavior.  

Bravo to another great Summit from Adobe.  Adobe is truly the leader in this nascent category and they are continuing to push the envelope with their vision.  I am super bullish on Adobe and what the future holds for the Marketing Cloud  Plus, having Imagine Dragons play at the bash was super awesome!!!

Marketing Is Dead, and Loyalty Killed It - HBR

Hmmmmm.  I thought I would love this article from the title, but it really was lacking any real insight.  Sure, everyone can point to Apple and say look, they really didn't do any marketing and they sold 74 million devices at $700 a piece.  It took many years and building a sticky ecosystem for them to be able to get to that point.  Loyalty should always be the main goal of your business, but marketing is still an intricate part of that equation. 

How to Activate Your Inactive Email Subscribers

Not my favorite article, but some good points to live by as a database marketer.  My main pet peeve is sending too many emails.  This has slowly been getting better through the years, I don't find myself getting so many daily emails, which is a testament to analytics I would imagine.

There are a number of reasons, but there are several common ones. And there are a lot of reasons at different companies. But the main one that we've found is that customers receive too many emails. So, it's always important for an email marketer to understand [customers'] preferences—especially the mailing frequency that your customers prefer. It's always important not to overwhelm them with emails. When you send too many emails, you're causing them to tune out.... They'll look at them, and just ignore them.

Getting back a customer that has become inactive is very difficult, so have different strategies for customers that are trending toward inactivity.  In my history I call these customers decliners and it is easier to save them before they become inactive.

The True Purpose of a Loyalty Card Program

Loyalty card programs are now a way of life.  So many businesses in every vertical has a loyalty program based on dollars spent.  The programs range from miles in airlines, to how many stamps does a customer have on their stamp card before they get a free yogurt.  The belief is these programs will drive loyalty and incremental purchases because of the benefits offered for the spend.  But do they really drive incremental spend?  Or should the true purpose of the program not focus on the incremental spend, but something entirely different?

Airlines are the standard bearer for loyalty programs.  Frequent travelers swear by the loyalty programs and can tell you how many miles they have in their account.  With so many travelers being able to quote their miles, this must work correct?  In reality very few of the people traveling through the air really care about the loyalty programs.  Most will actually look for price or non-stops when making a decision on who to fly with.  So who are these travelers who care about the program?  They are the 2% that drive most of the revenue.  Well that's a good thing right?  The funny part about this model is most of these travelers are not actually paying for their flights.  They are frequent business travelers who are not paying out of their own pocket, their work or customers are paying for it.  The irony of these loyal customers is they would never spend that kind of money with the airline if it was their own.  They are loyal to the program because they would like the free travel when they want to go somewhere on personal time, with the family.  

So what happens with the remainder of the travelers?  Is the program enough to drive loyalty?  The answer is no.  But that is ok.  They shouldn't be designed to drive loyalty from these customers.  If they actually did, they would more than likely be too rich of a program.  So what happens to the 98%?  Should companies just not push their loyalty cards on the rest of this market?  

Loyalty program should only be rich enough for customers to want to be tracked.  Now this means many different things for each industry.  For airlines it might mean a free amenity if the customer is a member of the loyalty program.  For a yogurt shop it could be a free topping for a member.  For a casino it is the ability to receive a comp.  Grocery stores are masters, you don't get the sale price unless you are a member.  Of course I want to join for that $10 off of my grocery bill.  

Loyalty programs are an opt-in for tracking behavior.  For the majority of your customers, the loyalty rewards in your program will either be out of reach or not worth any incremental spend.  But, what you are getting is behavioral data.  How often is the customer engaging, how much is the customer spending, what are the customers patterns.  Do they only come for sales?  Do they come only when they have an incentive?  Do they come a certain day of the week?

This is the gold that comes from the loyalty program.  Mining that gold has unlimited opportunity.  Loyalty programs have 3 major flaws.

1. They are not targeted
2. They are not proactive
3. They are easily copied

Loyalty programs treat customers differently based on 1 metric, a total amount of something.  Whether that's miles flown, purchases made or points that equate to dollars spent, the one metric is dollars spent.  Well that is a good start for measuring a customer, but what if a Customer A spent $500 3 times and Customer B spent $10 150 times?  They will both be in the same loyalty tier because they spent a total of $1,500, but they are entirely different customers.  If the company can get Customer A to spend 1 more time, it is worth a lot more than if they can get Customer B to spend 1 more time.  So the loyalty program doesn't incentivize customers equally.

Loyalty programs rely on customers to want to interact.  They are reactive mechanisms, waiting for customers to spend enough to get whatever reward the customer may be wanting.  Of course good database marketers can send out reminders that someone is close to a reward or they might move up a tier, but the reward has to be enough of a carrot for that customer to change their behavior.  

All the great innovations a company can make in their program can be copied by anyone, because it is a documented program.  If the strategy is to own loyalty by having the best program, any competitor could easily come over the top and have a richer program.  This leads a race to the bottom mentality.  The company could always come back over the top, but the programs start becoming too rich, remember only be rich enough to track behavior.  If a competitor can negate your best selling points (loyalty program), then the program can never be a competitive advantage, nor do you want it to be.

This all leads to the true reason to have a loyalty program, tracking behavior.  With targeted direct marketing, companies can inventive the behavior they are looking for.  A company can give Customer A a much different communication and offer because they know that the customer will spend $500 the next time they can get the customer to engage.  The direct marketing can be proactive.  Direct marketing can take a customer from someone that rarely comes in, to someone that engages with the business on a regular basis.  Last, but certainly not least, companies can innovate without being copied. Because direct marketing is not a published benefit, there can be many different tactics for a range of different customers and the competition is blind to the strategies.  

There is so much more opportunity in direct marketing compared to the loyalty program.  By keeping expenses as small as possible in the loyalty program, it leaves much more money for direct marketing to drive the business.  When allowed to drive the business, direct marketing can target customers in many different ways, based on the customers individual behaviors, with incentives that will truly drive that particular customer.  A loyalty program will never be able to do that as effectively. 

'70 Percent of CRM Installs Fail' and Other Crappy Stats You Should Ignore

The big stat that I think is very interesting is the total amount of organizations that have marketing technology installed.  Such a low number.

by looking at data from 3 million businesses in our Fall 2014 report, that the truth — a statistically significant number across all sizes of business, and 151 industries — is much harsher. Marketing technology (as a whole) only has 4.1% penetration, let alone marketing automation.

The Slow Decline of Companies

In Seth Godin's latest blog he mentions how company's almost always melt, they rarely explode. It is almost always the short-term thinking of today that causes the crisis of tomorrow. 

Rarely in the moment, when business is down and your customers are no longer engaged can a corporation look back and find the reason. That's because it's multiple little reasons that were made in years past for short-term gains that lost the customers trust. 

Trust in a personal relationship is hard to regain, but trust in a consumer to business relationship is almost impossible to regain. 

The Case for Why Marketing Should Have Its Own Engineers

Today, he runs the marketing team like an independent agency within the organization complete with its own engineers — a strategy he highly recommends for small teams that need to get a lot done fast.

An interesting article to set up an in-house agency to support all of marketing.  As a database marketer, I truly believe the team needs its own database and its own engineers to maintain this database.  It has to be separate from the IT processes that slow down progress.

Why?

Why shouldn't marketing data be included in the rest of the organizations data?

The simple answer is time.  Most data put into data warehouses are used for analytics.  Sounds just as important right?  Analytics is the driver of making money in the organization correct? 

Sort of.  This data can also include financial data that has different processes based on financial rules, especially for public companies.  Some data might include credit card information, which need to be PII compliant.  This data needs strict data governance and encryption of sensitive data.  All of this takes time.

Time is the enemy of marketing.  The amount of time it takes to get data into a marketing database relates to an amount of revenue that is being lost.  Most data requested into a marketing database is used right away in segmentation for campaigns.  These campaign changes either drive revenue or save on expense.  Having engineers able to get data into the marketing database in an expedited process gives an organization a competitive advantage. The quicker new data equals the more efficient database marketers.  All this leads to more money to the bottomline.  

How to Find, Assess, and Hire the Modern Marketer

Who is the modern marketer?

Regardless of the role in marketing, the expectations related to data and analytics need to be consistent. While there will always be more advanced analytical and technical positions, there is a new baseline for all marketers. The skill set includes a knowledge of data management principles and analytical strategies, and an understanding of the role of data quality, the importance of data governance, and the value of data in marketing disciplines. Today’s marketer needs to go well beyond reporting and metrics, and be more proficient in a full range of analytics, which may include optimization, text, sentiment, scoring, modeling, visualization, forecasting, and attribution.

Marketers need to have experience with the technology, tools, and design approaches that leverage data and analytics. Campaign design, multi-channel integration, content performance, personalization, and digital marketing can all be driven by fact-based decision-making, ideally with direct accountability to results and the ability to very quickly react and adjust to the demands of the customer and the market. The marketers I am referring to have a distinct blend of creativity and reasoning talents; they are inquisitive, inventive, and enthused by a culture that is advanced and agile.

Great article that really describes what marketers are becoming.  I believe this change in what a marketer is has been happening for quite a few years now.  A a marketer It is so important to understand the tools, data and how to analyze the data.  

Social Media Study: E-Mail 40 times more Effective than Facebook and Twitter

So, after all the excitement about Facebook and Twitter as communities and marketing panaceas, a recent study by McKinsey & Company reports something counter-intuitive: good, “old fashioned” e-mails prove to be 40 times more effective than Facebook and Twitter combined.

That is, if your goal is to acquire customers, and not just share the latest family news or travel experience.

I don't really understand why they say this is "counter-intuitive".  I have believed for a long time that social media was not a good channel for businesses.  It costs a lot of money to be in those channels because of the immediacy that customers expect, but more importantly these channels are not targeted whatsoever.  When posting on Twitter or Facebook, everyone gets to see what is being posted.  Whether those are the customers you are trying to target or not.  It is an even worse channel when it comes to current customers.

It’s a lot of work, but the the research sighted Williams-Sonoma which reported a 10% improvement in response rates by personalizing their e-mails, based on the customer’s on-site and catalog shopping preferences.

Another interesting comment.  Of course there is better response when the emails are targeted to customer behavior.  When customers get offers that are tailored to their behavior they spend more, it is just a simple fact.  When email is used as a simple newsletter channel, they will get lost.  Don't over communicate and keep the offers tailored.  Those are the keys to effective email marketing.

Why Netflix walked away from personalization | ThoughtGadgets

n 2006 Netflix offered a $1 million prize for anyone who could improve its movie preference recommendations by 10%. Netflix, at the time, made most of its money sending DVDs in the mail to users’ homes

Mathematicians went wild. The competition was lauded by business pundits as an example of crowdsourcing genius. Because this was damned hard math, the project took years. And then in 2009, a team of mathematicians called “BellKor’s Pragmatic Chaos” actually cracked the code, achieved a 10% lift, and Netflix gave them the $1 million.

And then … Netflix never implemented the winning algorithm. Because personalization at that point no longer mattered.

Personalization has been such a buzzword for so many years.  Netflix was one of the poster children for this.  It's interesting to look at articles like this and understand they really don't utilize it like say an Amazon does.

In fact, this article is very critical of Amazon and I'd have to agree.  Amazon has decent recommendations, but it seems to be a fairly basic market basket model that shows what others who bought similar items.  That may be the best way to offer items to customers.  Amazon has all the money in the world for R&D, in fact they flaunt how much money they put back into their business and if they are using this model, it must mean the personalization models of predicting other types of product must not bring in as much as the market basket.

Can You See the Opportunities Staring You in the Face?

I’ve come to believe that less than 1% of the data is truly useful.

Exactly!  Most businesses are very simple if you look for the key metrics.  So many times people want to show their worth by over thinking the problem.  If I can come up with some new innovative way to look at this problem, I'll be a superstar.  But more times than not it isn't a complex problem.  Humans are fairly simple to predict.  Most humans will fall into patterns and want very straightforward things.  New data doesn't need to be introduced until you have gotten everything out of the current data you have.

Big-data initiatives are proliferating, and the information is getting more complex all the time.

There’s a lot of potential benefit for both retailers and customers.

But only if the data is well managed and well understood. Statistics literacy isn’t very high in most businesses. A few educational institutions have realized this and are making a push to turn out business graduates who know their way around a regression analysis. But for the most part, businesspeople aren’t familiar enough with statistics to use them as the basis for good decisions. If you don’t understand the numbers, you can go a long way down a bad road very quickly. That’s why every team charged with making decisions about customers should include a trusted individual who understands statistics. If that understanding isn’t between your own two ears, make sure you bring a person with that skill set onto your team.

Being able to understand what the data is telling you is more important that having a degree in statistics.  Interpreting data is really where the opportunities present themselves, not in figuring out the most optimal model.  I suggest having someone who is proficient in building statistical models and ask a lot of questions from the output.  Start to understand what the answers  of models are telling you and simplify the results into something that can be used in the future.  A model may tell you that people who buy a particular item are likely to be loyal, but is it the item that drives the loyalty or is this just a coincidence?  The better you understand your data, the better decisions you will make and you don't have to be a data scientist to do that.

The Revolutionary Way Marketers Read Your Financial Footprints

Laube, 43, Cardlytics’ president and COO, and Grimes, 51, its CEO, have since helped pioneer a data-driven advertising niche called merchant-funded rewards. It targets people based on what they buy, not who they are. “If you know where and how someone is spending money, you know lots of things about them without having to know their personally identifying information,” Laube says.

I have found that the transactions of customers is the most important predictor of future behavior in all data I have studied.  While the demo, geo and psychographics of customers is very interesting data, to maximize the revenue from known customers is to really get to know their transactions.

While I don't know how good these algorithms are, the theory is solid.  I happen to be a Bank Of America customer and the deals I receive don't seem to be any better than say my Rapid Rewards dining offers which don't seem to know my eating habits whatsoever.  If these can be perfected, I think it's something that would get me to use my card more often instead of using my AMEX.  I'll be watching because this is very intriguing.  

Getting a bit creepy

It’s hard to describe what’s the tipping point, the point where things turn from useful/entertaining to creepy. To me those two examples did cross the line. And I wish I could put my finger on exactly what makes it creepy, but it’s hard.

Perhaps it’s when the application or service makes it blatantly clear that they can read your messages, that they actually have unlimited access to all the names and numbers in your address book. That they do track where you access the site from regularly. And not only do they have this information and access, they feel that it’s ok for them to use it rather openly. And they do make it personal. It’s not some trending data aggregated over millions of customers. It’s my data, extracted and pinpointed to be used on (or as it feels, against) me.

I’m trusting you with my data. I realise there are risks involved, but please treat my data with respect. Just because you can doesn’t mean that you should. And don’t be a creep.